Precedents:
Rokko Housing One - Tadao AndoAn excellent concept, but what if you don't have a mountain?
The Mountain - BIG and JDS
If you don't have a mountain, you make one...
Simply, you have housing and you have parking. How can you change these two separate entities into one mass?
"Rural site with Urban densities..."
Provides a greater diversity of design and less symmetry (even if there is only one unit design but rotated). The use of roof-top grass terraces is a bonus, but not effective in rainwater collection.
I learned from these studies some things I like and don't like. The concept of terraced housing with parking under it as a base for the elevations seems like an obvious answer. However, the massing of the Mountain is more than I would like. A smaller number of homes per building will provide a less-dense, more private opportunity.
Site:
The concept of quartering the entire site remains from last week's design. Central roundabout remains but now houses a significant wind turbine. Siting of complexes is now designed to capture southern light and buffer S/SW winds. Rainwater collection will be at the individual level.A few different approaches:
A - responds to sun and wind. May require more pathways and smaller parking garage options.
B - like the stacked option's ability to buffer wind and the stepped terraces. Dislike how similar it is to precedents.
C - as with B, responds to sun and wind, this time providing half the units with E&S views and half with S&W views. Inner spaces and space underneath stacks can be utilities and parking. I would like to develop this layout in the site. Will need to standardize unit dimensions and features to control terraces and utility spaces.
D - similar to B but closer to turbine. This siting in each quadrant would create a type of inner-city surrounded by forests. This siting would be convenient if programs such as convenience stores and grocery shopping centers are implemented into the design.
No comments:
Post a Comment